A Great Time to Buy Your First House? 5 Tips To Consider

In the general economic climate in 2010, for many first time house buyers, this period represents an excellent opportunity to buy a house (new or existing) at a very attractive price in some of the most livable places in their country: though deposits are higher, asking prices are way off their highs, they have multiple choices of properties, initial mortgage rates are very low compared to historical rates, making properties really affordable, if you are a first time buyer.

What’s the risk?

But interest rates are now beginning to creep up slowly in various parts of the world. Central banks are fighting a very difficult balancing act right now: between deflationary recession and inflationary demand, because the usual tools to fight inflation have been relaxed so much. The risk is: if the double-dip is avoided, that rates will rise dramatically from current levels back to historical averages at least to stem the inflationary commodity price spikes.

Get Ready for Higher Rates

For first time buyers, this will mean: increased payments in their mortgage payments. I am enjoying the benefits of the extra 10-20% reduction in my own payments, but am quite sanguine that early next year we’ll see some upward increments in the rates. First time buyers will need to prepare themselves for the return to higher mortgage rates at some point in the next 12 months. What can a first time buyer do?

Fixed Rate Mortgage

Consider locking in rates with a fixed-rate mortgage loan. Why? Simply because the fixed rate mortage will keep payments at the same level for the life of the mortgage. With both mortgage rates and inflation likely to rise in the longer term, the payments will become relatively cheaper over time.

The additional benefit is that, if you know you are going to live in the same house for a long time, you will probably see a rise in nominal house value and cheaper relative mortage payments (because inflation will mean higher pay rises and costs).

And rates right now, albeit higher than Adjustable Rate Mortgages, are quite attractive. One site is featuring rates from 4.75% for 30 years and 4.25% for 15 year fixed rate mortgages (of course, a number of assumptions are made including your credit scores, profession, locality, etc.) so you may find rates more expensive than these numbers.

Increase Your Down Payment

First, figure out how much of the downpayment they can afford to make for their house purchase. The more the better your initial rate will be, and the less you will have to pay in additional rates when rises do come. I wouldn’t recommend any 100% mortages EVER, because of the increased risk that you might face. Try to pay out an initial 10% or even 20% of your house price on purchase, and don’t be tempted to fold additional niceties into the loan amount.

If you have been saving for a few years during the heat of the boom years, you will by now have saved a reasonably large amount. If you haven’t, don’t worry. There is still plenty of time to save money as these lowered prices are going to be with us for some time, at least until the recovery is well underway (in 2011?). So get started saving.

Make Regular Additional Payments

Making regular additional payments against your principal will, depending on your type of agreement and the TOS, mean that your interest payments will go down longer term. It also means that the term to repayment will shorten, and should help save a bundle of cash over the longer term. It’s like being given a surprise payment as the returns on each lump sum payment are pretty attractive. And certainly much more attractive than sticking the money in the bank at 1% pa.

Buy Desirable Property

Overall, I’d be looking to be desirable property, if I were living in the US and househunting. Why? Because it’s all too easy in a down market to only look at the sticker price, but to protect your house value, you will need a keen eye to see the potential purchase in terms of its market position today, and tomorrow. So don’t go looking in the bargain basement section of the real estate market. Those items are usually priced like that FOR A REASON.

Avoid Home Equity Loans

Once you buy your property, avoid taking out additional home equity loans on the house, especially if your initial downpayment was low. It will add to your overall payments each month and rates are much higher than regular mortgages. If you must renovate some or all of your house, try to do it from sources of funds (savings) that don’t put your own equity in the house at risk.

Disclaimer: InvestorBlogger is a homeowner, but doesn’t claim any professional knowledge as such of property markets or lending. Do your own research before you make any decisions.This post is sponsored.

Ever seen gold like this? It’s yellow, soft and valuable!

Gold is an exceptionally valuable commodity these days. To show that I already my own ‘stash’ in the bank vault, I’m happy to share this picture of our ‘wealth’.

yellow gold

In the West, I was used to seeing gold used in jewelery purely as one or even the largest component. When I first came to Taiwan, I was astonished how yellow (or ‘gold’) the was, and when I first got my gold wedding ring, how soft the metal actually is when it’s in nearly pure form. Most of the gold sold in China and Taiwan is of this type. Taiwanese especially value gold both for its beauty and its practicality. It’s easy to turn into cash.

Historically, there have been times when gold was perhaps the only store of true wealth here after the 2nd world war, during the tumultuous period of the Chinese Civil War, and so local people have traditionally valued it as a way to hedge their currency, protect their family ‘wealth’, and to carry easily, should the need arise.

I have no idea how much this is worth, but it’s probably not much. Christine received some gold as part of her wedding present, some of which is included here. It’s also traditional for brides and (to a lesser extent) and grooms to wear or flaunt as much gold as they can. Usually, some of the gold is presented to them, some is kept as part of the family wealth, and some may be ‘loaned’ from relatives.

Any idea how much this would be worth? I have my own estimates, but I have no idea how much the gold actually weighs. Perhaps one day, I’ll get it valued properly.

Borrow more, spend more, inflate away the debt: Darling’s prescription for success in 2009 and beyond

The politicians are at it again, in the UK. Raising taxes to pay for their own past mistakes. Unlike the US democrats, the British government can’t blame the other party at all for what’s happened, since they’ve been in power since 1997. I’m no economist by training, and I’m not living in the UK at the moment, so perhaps I’m ill-informed. Perhaps.

Today, Alistair Darling has proved to be nobody’s darling: He hiked the top rates of tax for those earning over £100,000 which according to one story combined with other plans of his are estimated to bring in an extra £6bn by 2012 rising to £17bn by 2014. He’s also trimmed benefits, taken away tax breaks, and much more…

Given that his assumptions are optimistic, to say the least, raising taxes on any segment of the population at this time is likely to vary from mildly regressive on most people to seriously foolish. I tend to the latter end of the spectrum. Why? Because those who are the entrepreneurs in the UK are the ones most likely to provide work for those who earn much less, and they need the capital to provide investment capital for future businesses.

Startups Need Capital

Startup capital comes from someone’s pocket, after all. If tax rates rise, entrepreneurs will conclude that the tax burden places an increased need for higher returns. This means that they will either find markets with better returns than ours, move their domicile off-shore, or simply exit the British markets. Or they will charge more for their products and services. Is it any wonder that British consumers typically pay over the odds for products and services? Hint: it could be linked to the amount of taxes they are paying, directly (VAT, etc.) and indirectly (corporate taxes).

budget 09Back to you and me

In the end, the only people who suffer are the ones who purchase the services and products, ie. you and me. Why? Because we’re the least informed on how to create tax efficient vehicles, how to get tax credits for investments, how to offset tax increases, and where to shelter money from grasping governments.

It’s all in the numbers

“His calculations, however, depend upon a forecast growth rate of 1.25% next year, rising to a figure of 3.5% in 2011.” (source) Does anybody seriously believe we’ll have growth in 2011 of 3.5%? Really, are you kidding? Mortgages are underwater, unemployment is jumping, people still can’t get credit, and others have their credit lines closed by banks too nervous to hold their customers hands any more. With customers needing more cash, where is all this consumer spending going to come from?

But what surprises me?

The tax rates are going to penalize those people whose talents are needed in investing, finance, law, politics, business, government, science, social services, health care, and so on, the ones we need to build, sustain and nurture our country. Doesn’t anyone remember the last grandiose experiment in raising taxes in the 1970′s when top tax rates virtually killed British industry, stifled entrepreneurs, and led (indirectly) to thousands of layoffs in all industries? Oh, well.

It’s in the figures

But I took a look at the graphs, and I don’t get it. It tells me that the government has borrowed £175bn, yet it makes no account of where this borrowing went, how it was divided up, or why it accounts for fully 26% of government incomes. Of course, it beggars belief that borrowed money could possibly count as ‘income’ in the first place. But worse, the interest on that money now eats up £28bn of expenditure. This makes it the seventh largest expenditure in the budget. And I would guess this amount will continue to grow even more. ( A crude calculation shows that this is at an APR of 16% … wow! Perhaps the government should find more economical ways to borrow money!) I do know that if I ran my business with interest amounts so large, and rates like these, I’d be moving as fast as possible to cut my debts, not borrow more.

Whither inflation?

Unfortunately, I’m not convinced: I think this set of figures bodes badly for inflation. The government will be tempted to inflate its way out of such large debts by allowing inflation to be higher when recovery comes. And it’s likely to include a period where we revisit oil prices in the $80′s and $90′s as soon as recovery begins. Inflation is around the corner, and gold prices are a hint of what is to come. But then again, I’m not an economist.

So buy your salt now if you believe prices are going to rise, or buy it later when it’s cheaper. Either way, these days you’re going to need a lot of it when you read the governments’ assessments of what is going on, and what is going to happen.

Taiwan banks reluctant to charge ‘account keeping fee’ – The China Post

Most Taiwan banks have no plan to levy a “deposits account keeping fee” from customers who have only a small sum of outstanding deposits in their accounts, although some foreign banks have already taken such a move.Some foreign banks, including Standard Chartered Bank and HSBC (Hong Kong and Shanghai Banking), have started charging a monthly fee from clients with less than NT$10,000 of deposits in their accounts.

Taiwan banks reluctant to charge ‘account keeping fee’ – The China Post – this article is typical of the usual double-speak that English newspapers in Taiwan are guilty of. The story is quite simple: with limited sources of income available, banks are now resorting to charging fees on low deposits. Typically this behavior is being seen in foreign-owned banks, who have already had account minimums for quite some time (another fact that ‘escaped’ the author of this story). The real news in this story is hidden away at the end: “The move of collecting the fee needs to be discussed and approved by the bankers association, he said. The talk about the possibility that Taiwan banks may charge a “deposits account keeping fee” from customers has caused concern from legislators.”

Bank ad by doctor_media Photograph of Shanghai Commercial and Savings Bank, in Taipei.

In real speak, this means legislators and banking organizations are already considering where and how banks charge regular amounts for bank accounts with less than a minimum amount in them. With interest rates as low as they are, it’s unrealistic to expect banks to shoulder these costs in the long term. However, looking after people’s money like this will attract a lot of criticism: why? Because banks are expected to use this money to make more money, it seems unreasonable that they should then make money on ‘free money’ and charge for the privilege of looking after it.

citibank - DSC01282 by yuankuei

A customer who’s charged such a fee will likely terminate their business with any bank that attempts to charge them such a fee. Worse, it may make it more difficult to market to these customers in the future when things get better, and everyone has more money. Customers will remember who tried to short-change them and who treated them with respect.

There’s one local bank I had to open an account with that I hated from the first day I dealt with them. They were unknowledgeable, unhelpful, unprofessional and discriminatory in their treatment of local foreigners. Oddly, enough, the credit card that I have with them through their credit arm has been the perfect opposite of that! Anyway, competition is heating up in the local banking market with local bank consolidating, and foreign players eager to get into the China market. Truly, Taiwan represents one of the few relatively untapped banking markets in Chinese Asia at the moment, still.

I’ve been consolidating and reorganizing both our personal accounts and business accounts for some time, as a result of the credit crisis. While I haven’t got that much money to move around really, I’ve tried to make sure that risk is more diversified between bank accounts. In other words, I wouldn’t want to be locked out of a supply of money due to bank run or temporary closure.

For personal finances, I’ve divided my money between one local and one international bank. For business finances, one month’s emergency cash was deposited in another branch of another local bank. The only weakness in the chain is that personal and business finances overlap in one local bank. I should really do something about that by moving some money to another local bank. Unfortunately, there aren’t many banks in our area at all: and none of the big Taipei city banks have branches here at all.

Penny Stocks: What does an 80% decline tell you about this company?

I have been tossing these Spam emails for a while, but this one I decided to take a look at. I have no idea why anyone would trust an email from a company with one name in the link and another in the email address. That’s the second sign of a problem! Let’s take a look at the offer on the table.

Email received from Barbra Farmer bonniedhama@a1container.com to kennethdickson@msn.com. (Hah! I don’t even have an email address at that location!) so it used a fake email address, fake name, and was sent to a non-existent email address.

Hague Corp. (OTCBB: HGUE)

Solterra Renewable Technologies, Inc.

I just wanted to tell you why I am so excited about this profile.

you can see Hague is truly revolutionary:

Solterra will be producing and distributing a Thin Film Quantum Dot PV Solar Cell, which is differentiated from other traditional PV cells by a unique technology
that can result in lower cost, higher efficiency, and broader spectral performance. I will personally be visiting the company later this day.

Look for much more on Hague Corp and Solterra Renewable Technologies, Inc.

Company: HGUE
Rating : very bullish
Sector : Green tech
Current: $0.10
Target : $0.74

Well, a brief summary. The stock traded at $0.02 in late April before bouncing to 50 cents. It has no income, no assets, some deals with some fancy names on it, lots of buzzwords. But it is difficult to see this as anything other than a spam. What do you think, Tim?

Do not consider this a recommendation or anything. This is a from a spam. I merely mention it as we all receive these spam emails. I wondered what the facts would be.

The British Pound vs. The Dollar

What is going on now? Last year the pound traded at over NT$66, now it is at NT$47 and likely to go to $45 soon. I was in Taipei 101 for lunch, and went upstairs to see the Taipei Stock Exchange which has recently agreed with London’s Stock Exchange on the sale of ETFs. This should be a good deal for Taiwanese investors making it easier and cheaper to find good quality, diverse ETFs.

It was while I was there that I noticed how much the British Pound had fallen that day against the US Dollar. It’s currently trading at about $1.3833 today and about NT$46.4864. This down by about 1/3rd against the US, and slightly less against the NTD! While my stocks are suffering, too, it gladly boosts my relative purchasing power!

british pound

But the vagaries of recent markets really make the mind boggle! Still when things are like this, there are opportunities for tremendous riches!

Investing in Property: Can you tell the three kinds of property apart?

Yesterday was a beautiful October day in Taiwan. Christine and I had been talking about one of the steps I outlined earlier in A Man and a Plan: renting out property. I finally was able to analyze the figures and make some modest suggestions on how to capitalize on our return by renting out our home, and living elsewhere.

  • 1. We would secure a line of income, currently we’d be able to earn nearly $1078 per year gross. Of course, we’d have to pay a renter’s tax at a gross 10%.
  • 2. We would be able to start saving for a new house, so we could expand our portfolio to two or even more houses.
  • 3. We’d get experience of different property markets as we could live in different areas throughout the metropolitan area.
  • 4. If we made additional mortgage payments, we’d be able to secure an additional 8.78% return because our mortgage payment would decrease by a proportionate amount.
  • 5. Each renter would have to pay a two month deposit, so we’d be able to invest that nearly US$1,100 as well. Obviously, it would have to be paid back at some point. But we could earn the interest on that amount in the meantime.

Naturally, we’d be willing property agents, and happy landlords… I am beginning to think it’s a step we would like to take. So yesterday, we went off to look at some alternative places to live. We went up into the mountain areas behind our home near XiaouPingDing area in Tamsui County. It’s right next to the city boundaries. We came across a beautiful property called in West in Hilla. This is a prestigious development begun in the late 90’s and restarted with the recent boom in property prices.

p01 29b

Its unique draw is the location: it has an absolutely uninterrupted view across the Tamsui Bay area from Sanchih on the right to the new port on the left. It was a bright breezy day on the mountains, and we thought we were in heaven. Clearly this is the impression the developer had intended… And it is unparalleled in all the years we’ve been looking at apartments, to get an apartment or house with such a view over the surrounding area. It left me speechless, the photographs on the website just do not do justice to this at all.

The PreSell: Dreams, Apartments, and Cold REALty

Because the pre-sell was all intended to build on that dream: a clubhouse, a hotel, reception center, shopping, etc. all supposedly top quality and ‘being built’. The community itself was composed of two types of accommodation: villas and apartments, with villas selling in the NT$20 million range, and apartments selling from approx. NT$4 million upwards. According to the sales lady, most villas and larger apartments were already gone, and there were none at our requested size. So she took us to see a modest apartment and a much larger (twice our current size). Both apartments were reasonably fitted out, refurbished, and spacious.

Let’s party like it’s 1999!

Slowly, though, we managed to piece together the story: the apartments phase I were originally built and sold at the end of the 90’s (no word on what pricing was used), but when the major earthquake hit us in 1999, all mountain side development stopped on government orders. Much of the central county of Nantou was in mountainous areas, and this area experienced great shaking, landslides, collapses, and a geographical upheaval on that fateful day.

Of course, this also coincided with a weakening of the property market island-wide; and the original developer collapsed, unable to complete development on some of the villas. This also happened at a similar time in many places island-wide. Only recently, did the government give the go-ahead to such communities whose projects had been suspended.

The DEAL: Wow!

These were, of course, snapped up on the cheap. I was told at about 1/3 of the current retail price. This was probably a firesale by the owning bank, as much property was sold by banks from the repossessions at the beginning of the 2000’s. The new developer then jumped into the fray, put up a lot of seed money, refurbished the units that were unsold, and relaunched the project in 2006-7 with a large marketing program. I’m pretty sure that the unfolding property boom also helped to shift product. Certainly the website is very nicely done, with lots of details and touches.

As the result of visiting this property, I was able to further some of my own thinking on property markets and figure out what kind of property this was. This is my statement on my theories…

The A,B,Cs of evaluating property

These three kinds of property are only clearly differentiated by price in a price recession, though in a property boom it may be difficult at times to differentiate clearly between the three categories, though not between A & C. So what constitutes each category?

Category A – property that is fairly valued.

This includes premium property as well as property that is always near fully valued. It’s rare to get a bargain on such property as it is usually undiscounted. Factors that identify its value: proximity to transportation centers, high desirability, stable pricing (even premium plus pricing), good area, building quality, builder reputation, etc.. In our area, we reckon there are two or three communities that rank in this category: ours, the one across the road, and perhaps one other. Ours is simply because of its proximity to the MTR and its sheer size; the one across the road because of its zoning as commercial land, it enjoys a 20% premium over ours; and perhaps another couple.

Category B -property trading at a discount to market.

property that is adjacent to Category A property or in some important respect resembles Category A property. In a property bubble, it may be difficult to identify this kind of property at all because it looks like, and smells like, Category A property. But in a property bust, this kind of property can lose value much more so than the first category. In the non-manic phases of the property cycle, this kind of property can sell at a discount to average property prices in the area. Near our community is an older community that is smaller in stature, with an older building, older design, and poorer quality construction. Its always traded at a discount to prices in our community, and its likely because few people would feel comfortable buying such a property, or living there. It’s just a poor quality building with a great location.

Category C -property that is valued otherwise.

You can usually spot this kind of property because the price being asked is enough to make you gasp in a property boom; and, in a bust, you’d guffaw. You know the type: the garage that fetches US$1.5 million in a boom can barely be sold in a bust: why? Because it’s the sign of excess when people start grossly overpaying for property that a beggar would turn their nose up at. If you guffawed or your jaw hit the floor, then it’s a Category C type property. In a boom period, it may be difficult to tell them apart.

So what is West-in-Hilla?

Well, when we went to see this mountain community, we thought initially we were looking at Category A type property – property that was otherwise premium value because of its location and environment. After we began to unravel the story, we realized it was a tale of two communities sitting cheek by jowl. The first are the town houses (luxury houses) that sit on their property and retail at good prices, most of which have been sold; and apartments (modern apartments) – which sit in smallish blocks around the community, and which enjoy fantastic views. We thought this was premium property.

But then we began to understand the background: distressed property that had been sold, polished up and resold at a huge markup to the original purchase price. We dug a little further on the net to see that property was in fact being marked down from NT$270,000 per ping to approx. NT$220,000 on first inspection. We reckoned we could get even under that rate without asking. Of course, we would drive a much harder deal… But then we came across one person who lived there who thought NT$180,000 per ping was still too expensive. So who knows what it’s really worth? It can be difficult to value such property.

That’s when we also noted that the community is built in a sensitive area (I wonder if a community like that would be approved at all today) and the woodland is ‘protected’. It’s situated on a hill-side, where much of the tree cover has been cut down, exposing it to quite heavy winds in winter, I imagine. Don’t mention a typhoon (of which we’ve had four this year already) which can bring wind speeds in excess of 100km/h. Although there isn’t any hillside directly behind it, the risk of earthquakes in mountaineous areas can cause property to be undervalued as landslides are common, roads are easily blocked (even in typhoons)… So it was quite clear that this community price (equivalent to a suburban or even select urban locations) was trading at unrealistic and unrealizable values.

Living in Environmentally Compromised Areas

In fact, we visited about six months ago several communities with a very similar mix of property on the coast, and found that prices had declined somewhat for apartments in that community since we had been there. Mostly, this was because the secondary resale market was quite tricky. Taiwanese people like to purchase property in the mountains as a retreat. Often, the realtor told us, they buy and never move in. Why? It’s likely because the wife thinks it’s just too inconvenient for life… so they sit empty. More often than not, they fall into disrepair, community payments aren’t kept up, and the community goes into early decrepitude.

Our final determination was very much: risky property dressed up as premium property for sale to suckers who couldn’t tell the difference. In other words, this is barely class B property in a boom, but in reality the investment is quite risky, and in fact the location means that the building itself has a risk profile that means perhaps even buying insurance is difficult. But the straw that broke the camels back, some online posters claimed that this developer tends not to fulfill promises. Given the size of the dreams that we were told, a certain natural skepticism in me already surfaced when I saw the plans. It’s unlikely that the developer will make good on much of his plans, simply because the profit margins may not be there. Discounts are already available on much of the property… So, he simply won’t be able to do the math, I reckon.

From the business point of view, I really can see why he did the deal. It was a win-win deal for him, his company and the current residents. He would recover his initial investment, make some money on his investments, and help finish the community that was started earlier. It had to be good for everyone.

Our own conclusion: Beautiful but Risky

We would have loved to live there. It would have made a perfect get-a-way from the city, and for people with a lot of money, purchasing a villa there wouldn’t have caused them unnecessary hardship if they couldn’t sell it particularly quickly. For us, though, we’d have been putting a considerable amount of our personal capital at stake. To purchase such an illiquid property as a mountain property can be would make no sense. It might be quite some time before we would be able to sell it, should we want to.

In general, though, the lack of fire in the local property market also means that such properties are on the outside of the hotspots in the market until late in the boom when they become the only affordable property to city dwellers. Right now, the property market is soft and prices are stagnant, partly in expectation of weakening prices and slower economic growth. In addition, in many areas, there is an abundance of available property soaking up latent demand anyway. That’s my take.

This story has been edited, amplified and beautified since publication .

Don’t forget to subscribe to the feed for this blog! Click here…

Citigroup – is it sleeping now (NYSE: C)

This is the sixth installment of my look at the Dow Jones Companies, the thirty finest American companies. Today we’ll be looking at Citigroup. This company is now trading somewhat in the doldrums due to the rather tricky credit crunch. Having already looked at JP Morgan, many banks are under pressure, underwater, could this be the right time to buy into the banking sector?

Citigroup (NYSE: C)

Citigroup is a worldwide financial service with 200 million accounts in more than one hundred countries. It provides a range of financial products to governments, consumers and corporations that includes investments, brokerage accounts, wealth management and consumer banking and credit. It merged with Travelers Group in April of 1998 and as of 2008 is one of the world’s largest banks (having dropped from first place just recently).

Early History

Citigroup began in 1812 as the City Bank of New York. As the company grew and absorbed other businesses and banking institutions, it diversified to include many different financial interests such as insurance companies and brokerage firms. Because of the diversity of its many branches, each balances out the other as financial cycles rise and fall.

Citigroup has historically been a very good investment due to this long-range planning for stability. However, the corporation has been involved in many questionable practices. In 2004, Citigroup disrupted the European bond market by selling billions in bonds and then buying them back cheaply when their trades forced the market to drop.

Would you tell your grandmother?

In 2005 the NASD levied more than $21 million in fines against Citigroup for violating mutual fund sales practices. In 2007, NASD again fined Citigroup more than $15 million for misleading retirees in seminars and not adequately disclosing risks to those investors. The banking institution was also heavily implicated in the Terra Securities scandal which negatively impacted the United States bond market. Just this year, in 2008, the attorney general of California disclosed that Citigroup was guilty of a computerized “sweep” that robbed its customers, mostly poor or recently deceased, and deposited their money in the bank’s general fund without notifying the victims of the robbery.

A Laggard, Really

Citigroup has underperformed for the past half decade, showing losses in nearly every quarter according to the Dow Jones Industrial Average index. Although the diversity of financial products and investments would seem to make Citigroup an excellent choice for a healthy portfolio, its questionable business practices and recent poor decisions should be cause for second thoughts. Whether or not business ethics matter to you as an investor, the recent spate of bank failures combined with Citigroup’s losses in the past few years indicate that a great deal of caution is advisable when considering Citigroup as an investment.

Caution is certainly the word: having grown its dividend steadily for years, the recent losses forced Citigroup to cut its dividend from 54 cents to 32 cents, this bank may warrant careful scrutiny if you should be interested in it. It currently falls at or near the bottom of the Dow Jones, and is of interest to Dogs of the Dow investors. But a look at the charts indicate that it has lost more than 60% of its stock value since the latter part of 2007. It is currently still loss making. Are you willing to take a punt? But then when there are still lots of other profit making banks out there, why would you?

Purchase Order: 10 DIA at 105.14

Just a quick note: I purchased 10 shares of DIA at 105.14 or thereabouts this afternoon. I had originally owned this stock (ETF) about three years ago, and regretted selling it. I was finally able to buy the shares back cheaper than I sold them. Of course, I lost out on the dividends on the intervening years totalling over $6 per share (after tax); I think these stocks represent a good price, and that the bailout (part 2.) will pass this time around, so I’m kind of expecting a turnaround shortly on the DJIA. Whether it will last or not, I don’t know. But the PE of 12 and yield are beginning to look attractive.

Oddly, though, the stock is already cheaper than I paid. I guess the markets don’t have any confidence in Congress as it’s already trading down.

I’m not recommending this stock, etc. please read my disclaimer.

Reading: Dragon’s Den – Would you enter the dragon’s lair?

While on holiday in the UK, I came across the TV Show on BBC called “Dragon’s Den“. This show isn’t a copy of the Apprentice, as it uses a very different format. Entrepreneurs approach a group of venture capitalists with their various ideas seeking additional capital for expansion.

It’s a fascinating series: Take a gander, yourself!

The group of VCs have to decide whether or not they will are ‘in’. There is some controversy associated with the program, but it is interesting. I would like to see more of the ‘follow-up’ to each of the deals. There’s also a book that I’m reading right now.