<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: OpenOffice vers. 2.2 and Google Apps: Did the fat lady sing for M$ Office yet?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://investorblogger.com/archives/openoffice-vers-22-and-google-apps-did-the-fat-lady-sing-for-m-office-yet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://investorblogger.com/archives/openoffice-vers-22-and-google-apps-did-the-fat-lady-sing-for-m-office-yet/</link>
	<description>Making Money, Doing Gadgets and Blogs: It&#039;s all a Dream!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2011 16:26:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Docs: Powerful Editing Features for Sharing! &#124; InvestorBlogger</title>
		<link>http://investorblogger.com/archives/openoffice-vers-22-and-google-apps-did-the-fat-lady-sing-for-m-office-yet/comment-page-1/#comment-8352</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Docs: Powerful Editing Features for Sharing! &#124; InvestorBlogger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 17:31:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.investorblogger.com/archives/openoffice-vers-22-and-google-apps-did-the-fat-lady-sing-for-m-office-yet#comment-8352</guid>
		<description>[...] Google Documents is relatively new to the scene, arriving significantly after Word XP, and even Open.... Naturally, in some areas it is much weaker than its offline counterparts. But there are a number of areas where its ease of use, its online nature and its collaboration features really help to set it apart from its offline relatives. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Google Documents is relatively new to the scene, arriving significantly after Word XP, and even Open&#8230;. Naturally, in some areas it is much weaker than its offline counterparts. But there are a number of areas where its ease of use, its online nature and its collaboration features really help to set it apart from its offline relatives. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: InvestorBlogger - Blogging, Tech, and Making Money - &#8220;A Random Walk To Wealth&#8221; &#187; Buzz: Google Docs adds Charting &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://investorblogger.com/archives/openoffice-vers-22-and-google-apps-did-the-fat-lady-sing-for-m-office-yet/comment-page-1/#comment-1617</link>
		<dc:creator>InvestorBlogger - Blogging, Tech, and Making Money - &#8220;A Random Walk To Wealth&#8221; &#187; Buzz: Google Docs adds Charting &#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 23:06:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.investorblogger.com/archives/openoffice-vers-22-and-google-apps-did-the-fat-lady-sing-for-m-office-yet#comment-1617</guid>
		<description>[...] OpenOffice vers. 2.2 and Google Apps: Did the fat lady sing for M$ Office yet?  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] OpenOffice vers. 2.2 and Google Apps: Did the fat lady sing for M$ Office yet?  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: InvestorBlogger</title>
		<link>http://investorblogger.com/archives/openoffice-vers-22-and-google-apps-did-the-fat-lady-sing-for-m-office-yet/comment-page-1/#comment-1586</link>
		<dc:creator>InvestorBlogger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 01:25:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.investorblogger.com/archives/openoffice-vers-22-and-google-apps-did-the-fat-lady-sing-for-m-office-yet#comment-1586</guid>
		<description>I agree. I only place some documents on Google at the moment, primarily because some of my documents are too difficult to convert well. But the primary reason is it&#039;s just too difficult right now to upload all my stuff to Google. I don&#039;t Google has the servers to handle it all, or the security guarantees to deal with the inevitable problems.

Kenneth</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree. I only place some documents on Google at the moment, primarily because some of my documents are too difficult to convert well. But the primary reason is it&#8217;s just too difficult right now to upload all my stuff to Google. I don&#8217;t Google has the servers to handle it all, or the security guarantees to deal with the inevitable problems.</p>
<p>Kenneth</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://investorblogger.com/archives/openoffice-vers-22-and-google-apps-did-the-fat-lady-sing-for-m-office-yet/comment-page-1/#comment-1578</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 19:06:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.investorblogger.com/archives/openoffice-vers-22-and-google-apps-did-the-fat-lady-sing-for-m-office-yet#comment-1578</guid>
		<description>Office is a great suite, but it is way overpriced.  OpenOffice is a great alternative and really isn&#039;t that much difference. Aside from the occasional minor glitches in conversion, you can&#039;t beat free. As for Google, I&#039;m still a little hesitant having all my documents online for Google to have access to. I&#039;d rather stay with a local software.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Office is a great suite, but it is way overpriced.  OpenOffice is a great alternative and really isn&#8217;t that much difference. Aside from the occasional minor glitches in conversion, you can&#8217;t beat free. As for Google, I&#8217;m still a little hesitant having all my documents online for Google to have access to. I&#8217;d rather stay with a local software.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

